
(quote from RealReality.org/Real_Faith_and_Reason_Vol_2_-_Scientia.pdf)
Secularists have perfected their language to sound innocent like the following:
“Having a religious belief isn’t a problem and certainly is protected by the Constitution. However, the primary protection in our Constitution is the separation of church and state, so religious beliefs cannot be used to make policy or law.”
Two problems plague this statement. First, the term “separation of church and state” isn’t in the Constitution. Rather, it comes from a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote. In Jefferson’s letter, the context was the State wouldn’t limit Christians or any other religions. The Constitution doesn’t limit Christians. However, it does limit the power of the state to regulate the free exercise of religion. Therefore, Jefferson used the term “separation of church and state” for just the opposite of what the secularists hope to accomplish. They try to get the state to regulate the exercise of religion.
Second, secularism establishes ungodliness as the state religion, which violates the Constitution. If the state establishes ungodliness as the preferred religion, ungodly people can use their made-up stuff about reality as a guide for making laws. But those who follow Christ can’t allow the love and wisdom that comes from Christ to guide them in making laws. We’re comparing made-up stuff to divine revelation. And how is made-up stuff superior to divine revelation? Why would we pass restrictive laws to limit divine revelation?
(end quote)




